Motivation in the workplace is the foundation of organizational success and personal satisfaction. It includes the psychological forces that determine the direction, intensity and persistence of an individual’s behavior in work. Managers, human resource professionals and even those who want to get the most out of their own career trajectories must understand what motivates employees to work, to excel, and to stay engaged.
In a world of work that is increasingly changing, with technology, economic conditions and diversity of the workforce, the complexities of motivational dynamics at work have become more complicated and more important. This essay will review the various aspects of work motivation, exploring fundamental theories, key elements and practical consequences of establishing a motivated workforce.
Theories of Work Motivation
Many theories of motivation exist, each viewing the driving forces behind employees from a slightly different angle. Traditionally, past theorists felt it was the basic need that drive employee behaviour. Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs-This theory depicts humans in a pyramidal fashion where needs are arranged from the most fundamental such as water, food, and a roof over our heads at the bottom to self-actualisation at the very top.
This pyramid would suggests to those working that, once needs at the bottom have been satisfied, the individual will aim for satisfactions higher up like recognition, development and actualization of talent at the top of the pyramidal structure.
Frederick Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory- This popular theory separates factors into two, ‘hygiene factors’ and ‘motivators’. ‘Hygiene’ factors relate to job satisfaction, such as salary, working conditions, job security etc, they do not necessarily motivate but the absence can cause dissatisfaction, whereas ‘motivators’ such as personal development, recognition and opportunities to advance promote higher motivation and job satisfaction. This theory concludes good working conditions are insufficient for motivation in their own right. It is opportunities to achieve that provides the real boost to employee morale.
Theories of cognitive process help shed light on more than the role of needs. The Expectancy Theory, conceptualized by Victor Vroom, suggests that the likelihood of any behavior will be directed toward the achievement of a goal by an individual is dependent on his belief that (1) his action can result in a specific desired outcome; and (2) achievement of desired outcomes are valuable to him (Luthans, 1989:227). Thus there is a linkage between an effort, a performance and a reward.
An employee would be motivated to put his effort if he perceived that (1) his efforts will lead to improved performance, (2) performance would then result in specific outcome(s) and (3) the employee values the outcomes and that outcome would then mediate further behavior on behalf of the effort required to do this, and (4) if you put into the job a lot of effort you, will get promoted(Mullins 1999).
So for example, you work overtime because you believes this will help with a possible promotion (expectancy), which would then follow good performance on that overtime work(instrumentality), and this promotion is indeed desired(valence).
Equity Theory – J. STACY ADAMS THEORY the Equity theory suggests that individuals are motivated to act if they perceive an equilibrium or balance between the ratio of what I take out (the outputs, say, pay, praise and working conditions) and the ratio of what is putting in (my efforts, skills, time and experience) compared to what I put into the company and what it gets from others who do comparable jobs.
Equity Theory suggests that when there is inequity they lose motivation; for instance, an employee might decide to reduce effort if his remuneration has been less to restore equity in an employment relationship as, for instance he/she might negotiate for a higher salary if he/she perceives another with his / her years of experience and same standard of performance earning more .
Equity theory was proposed by. J. Stacy Adames (1963), and developed by Adams and Wlorkevvitch in 1968 and as the years goes by it, there has been further and additional development by some scholars and authors, in accordance with its assumptions it states that when an individual feels that his inputs to his job have been valued less then he would compare it to the outcome he gets, this would eventually lead to lose of motivation on his side on that job which is also been valued much by comparison to those with lower inputs than him.
In closing, SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY, another recent perspective, highlights the power of intrinsic motivation, motivation that comes from within. It asserts that all people share three universal psychological needs: the need for autonomy, the need for competence, and the need for relatedness. When these basic needs are met, individuals are inherently driven to engage in activities and learn. External pressure and incentives, according to SDT, can often interfere with and even damage this intrinsic desire.
What Motivates People to Work
As well as theory there are a number of important factors that practically influence work motivation. Many of these have to do with the job itself. So where as those jobs high in interesting tasks and with high variety for example that are those of a Software Architect or a Senior Scientist are those most motivating as they call into play people’s abilities and call for the development of new ones.
These ideas are reflected in a range of ways, from job enlargement through to more recently job crafting.
Thus if an employee is in a repetitive job coding the same thing, over and over, over a year then this would certainly have a negative influence. On the other hand if another was able to use the skills of innovation and problem solving, across a range of projects this would have a positive impact.
A further key factor which influences the motivation to work for an employee isrecognitionandfeedback. People wish to feel that they count for something and that the activities that they engage in makes a difference. Regular, useful, Feedback gives an individual a clearer indication of how well they are performing and gives them a chance to understand the ways in which they could improve; it also serves to show that their work is recognized.
This feedback can take the form of a “thank you” to just the simplest of things, through to formal reward or praise.
If employees believe their work is appreciated and that their manager recognizes their contribution then this has a significant effect on the overall morale and commitment. A report by Deloitte found a huge positive impact on the retention rates of staff within businesses that gave meaningful recognition. A retail team who get to see how well they are performing relative to target, get informal, individualistic praise, and know their effort contributes to the overall success of the organisation will generally be much more motivated than those who receive little or no information about how well they are doing.
Leadership Definitely Impacts Motivation Leadership has a definite impact on worker motivation. In short, a good leader is a Motivator, Coach and Role Model and establishes an environment of productive work. They are able to set expectations, equip people with what they require and encourage employees to feel they have the psychological safety to take risks, or to question things. Transformational leaders capable of inspiring their following and instilling a sense of purpose and motivation are the most effective in raising work motivation.
Contrast the manager who micromanages and whines with the manager who trusts their people, mentors them and gives people credit and the second team will consistently be more motivated than the first! Another Key motivator is Organizational culture Just like leadership, culture has a massive influence on motivation and the drive of a workforce.
A culture of collaboration, innovation, respect and the genuine welfare of staff often translates into a motivated work-force, unlike a culture where the workforce thrives on misery and excessive competition, as well as zero trust, this will suck any potential drive out of people, no matter how good their individual job or leader is. As a simple example, a culture which drives its teams to never stop learning, and encourages innovation will probably have greater levels of intrinsic motivation than a company that Punishes mistakes and hoarding information.
Last but not least, individual differences are influential determinants. This includes aspects like career ambitions, personality and personal values. For instance, some employees are naturally high in achievement motivation, whereas others are driven by a need for security or to connect socially with peers. Taking into account individual differences in motivation style can help organizations customize its efforts to make employees feel engaged in their work environment.
For example, a manager aware that one person is motivated by public attention and another prefers recognition of the type ‘job well done privately’ can use these different Motivational Driver-tailored interventions effectively.
Practical Implications for Enhancing Work Motivation
Translating academic wisdom into action plans which foster work motivation thus should be approached holistically. Instead of surface-level carrots and sticks, businesses should provide an environment in which workers can unlock their innate motivation. Yet, there are some practical approaches businesses can try to spark workers’ motivation.
Another important approach would be good job design – an audit of the job requirements should be conducted to assure that the task is exciting, satisfying and there is a scope to develop skills and to take ownership.
Methods of job re-design, namely job rotation, job enlargement and job enrichment may be considered to enhance workers motivation and engagement. A role of a customer care representative, for instance, could be redesigned by allocating some high-impact, complicated problem-solvingtasks, some training roles for new staff or inclusion into some innovative processes to build a better sense of mastery and control.
Supporting, inspiring leadership. Invest in leader training covering skills like coaching, communication, and emotional intelligence. Leaders who have a clear vision, build trust, and motivate individuals and teams to be all they can be serve as the ideal example.
They lead the culture through their attitude and beliefs.
Invest in creating a positive culture through collaboration, open communication and employee well-being It takes time to create a positive work culture but it yields huge benefits. Companies should focus on open and honest communication, collaboration, teamwork and taking care of their people. Activities like team-building events, offering employee assistance programs and providing flexible working schedules will help a great deal. Companies with open, transparent policies for all staff will earn trust.
Celebrate and welcome differences in motivation.
Personalities and interests vary between individuals so a one size fits all solution isn’t ideal. Managers need to invest time in understanding the individual preferences, goals and strengths of employees. Have regular, individual meetings with staff, find out about their dreams, aspirations and work with them to create plans.
Provide choices in project work and even work schedules where this may be feasible. Perhaps a talented, senior employee would benefit from coaching junior employees. Some might feel more motivated by a project where they can lead out.
Summary
What FactorsInfluence Our Motivation To Work. The role and work of motivating employees (especially the factors influencing the willingness to work in the enterprise) is crucial, for every organization seeking success, be it in a competitive environment. They depend on several psychological-social and work elements such as needs, thoughts and experiences of an employee, characteristics of the position (job), management style, social relationships in the company, or the overall culture in a workplace organization and Individual differences.
However, as mentioned above, many such psychological theories and factors are very useful, and if they were translated to practice, organizations should look at them strategically.
By having strong design job analysis, feedback/recognition system and inspire employee/leader and recognize their differences, organization are able to generate happy and satisfied people that are dedicated in job and organization. Work motivation is now more than the function of an organization. It’s a strategy required for organization sustainability.
WeeklyMinds.com is proud to feature an author who brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to our blog. Weekly Minds is an accomplished freelancer writer with 12 years of experience in the field.
WeeklyMinds.com has a passion for sharing insights and perspectives on political, news, technology, home improvement, interiors and many more. Their unique perspective on current affairs has been featured in numerous publications and they have been a guest speaker at college fests.
WeeklyMinds.com is also an avid interest in writing and reading and enjoys singing, music, shopping, travelling and some more. In their free time, they can often be found of reading the novels and various current topics.
We are thrilled to have Elia Scala as a contributor to WeeklyMinds and look forward to their continued insights and contributions to our blog.